It’s been a
long time since a player as well rounded as Toby Alderweireld has sported the
lilywhite of Tottenham Hotspur. Arguably the best defender in the Premier
League and amongst the finest in Europe, the Belgian has a skill-set beyond the
needs of his position, and this extends to his off-field antics.
On
Wednesday, Alderweireld shared a piece from The Times about Southampton’s player liaison officer, Hugo Scheckter, coming
out to the squad as gay. It’s warmed the hearts of the Spurs faithful, and even
Saints fans who turned their back on the centre-back when he chose a move to
North London were respectful.
By now you’re
probably thinking: 'Sean, we’re three paragraphs in, why are you talking about
Toby Alderweireld?' Coincidentally, Toby’s public response has come at a time
where Tottenham have been heavily linked to signing a player – Paris Saint-Germain
right-back Serge Aurier.
So how are
the two matters linked? In truth, it probably is what I just called it, a mere
coincidence. But the timing is nonetheless impeccable.
Aurier is a
notorious figure in the French capital. He was found guilty of assaulting a
police officer in September 2016, narrowly avoiding a prison sentence (but
being denied a visa into the country for PSG’s match with Arsenal). That wasn’t
the first of Aurier’s offences, though.
Earlier in
the year, Aurier was involved with a live-stream using Twitter’s sub-service,
Periscope. During it, he insulted and personally attacked several team-mates and Laurent
Blanc, who was manager at the time. Notably, he called Salvatore Sirigu gay, Blanc
‘a faggot’, and said that “he takes everything”, before further asserting that
Blanc gives oral sex to Zlatan Ibrahimovic.
Of course,
such words are going to cause a storm, and Aurier acted cowardly in the
immediate aftermath, insisting the person in the video wasn't him.
The excuse
didn’t wash though, and Aurier released a statement apologising to his peers
and coach. Notably, he didn’t apologise for his ‘colourful’ choice of words,
and I sense this was deliberate.
What Aurier said was inspired by hate. He was deliberate and aggressive with his vocabulary. His prejudices could not be more obvious if he's voicing them on a public broadcast, and even saying 'sorry' once would not be enough to cover it.
What Aurier said was inspired by hate. He was deliberate and aggressive with his vocabulary. His prejudices could not be more obvious if he's voicing them on a public broadcast, and even saying 'sorry' once would not be enough to cover it.
As far as
football ability goes, Aurier is a fine right-back. He would be the strongest
in that position at Spurs, and has the potential to surpass Kyle Walker. But I
can’t stress enough how bad signing a player who harbours these blatant
prejudices would be.
People have
been pushing for the Ivorian’s signing on the basis that he would improve the team, that ‘as long as he plays well he
can do what he likes’. I emphasise the term ‘team’, because although his
footballing qualities are evident, it’s his personality that would be a
negative for the club.
Football
isn’t just about eleven blokes having a kick-about, it’s not even just about
winning – if it were, we wouldn’t invest our lives and a good chunk of our
income on the clubs we love.
Our club
was in crisis in 2013-2014, and it wasn’t just about what was happening on the
pitch. Tottenham finished 6th with 69 points, their fourth highest
tally in the Premier League era. There was, however, a clear divide within all
corners of the club. The fans, the players, the people upstairs, none saw
eye-to-eye. It was a shambles, and we’ve come a long way to improve every
single aspect of this club.
Those who
felt the pain and suffering of that time era, yet want to sign Aurier, are
hypocrites. Tottenham’s reputation will be in tatters, and even speculation
regarding a potential transfer has divided the fan-base. The club is in danger of falling away
again.
For the
better part of a decade, Spurs fans have spent plenty of time sticking it the
likes of Chelsea and Liverpool for their religiously vile backing of players
regarding racism. Again, any of us who contributed to that but advocates Aurier’s
signing is a hypocrite.
There’s
probably a select few arguing that the players in question, John Terry and Luis
Suarez, helped their clubs massively, and that if a key player of ours was
involved in such an incident that we’d back him too. That’s wildly inaccurate.
If Harry Kane came out with a racist statement tomorrow, I’d want him out. Simple
as.
Maybe
people don’t care about the incident because it doesn’t directly impact them,
which is pathetically ignorant. Would the core of our fan-base want to sign
Aurier if he was racist about white people? Probably not, so why ignore his
sexual prejudices?
As I’ve
already alluded to, I’d rather lose with morals than win without them. Is that
such a bad thing? Is defending a homophobe the hill you want to die on?
Again, some
are bound to be questioning me as a football fan, but who’s really in the wrong
here, someone who is homophobic, or the guy who’s condemning him?
Young
people make mistakes, footballers are no different, I get that. But I’d say
that a guy who knows he has an international following making disgusting
comments about his co-workers and employers purposely on a live-stream is more
than a mistake, and maybe even unforgivable, especially when his apology was lightweight.
There’s an
attitude regarding homophobia in football that needs to be addressed. Far too
many are dismissive of the issue, and the longer it manifests, the more toxic
the sport will become. The BBC produced a documentary on the issue recently,
and I urge all to watch it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b08z2jpc/ad/gareth-thomas-v-homophobia-hate-in-the-beautiful-game
People
throughout the game are picking and choosing when discrimination is acceptable.
I was sat right in front of Gary Lineker at the Linford Christie Stadium last year
when, in an interview with the Guardian
last year, he dismissed Jamie Vardy’s racist comments in 2015.
“I think it
depends on how you say it and when you say it,” said Lineker.
No, Gary.
There are no excuses for racism. Ever.
If a man as
respected in the game as Lineker is spreading this sort of message about
discrimination, what does that say?
Some of my
closest friends are part of the LGBT community, I went with one of them to
Pride in London last month. In February, I was attacked for wearing rainbow
laces in support of the movement. I will continue to valiantly support them,
and that extends to this ordeal. Spurs LGBT have said they’ve contacted the
club to let them know their thoughts regarding any potential deal.
Tottenham
Hotspur Football Club are reaching the pinnacle of their footballing history –
it’s not worth risking that for a homophobic right-back.
no sean.
ReplyDeletewatch the highlights video for fucks sake.
he loves slide tackles!
Well written and reasoned piece. Must see the whole footballer not just what they do on the pitch.
ReplyDeleteExcellent piece, personally I do think we need another right back but not this guy. THFC have probably worked as hard as any club on inclusivity and signing this guy would be a backward step. A lot of people seem to be in favour of the signing, but honestly there are more important things in life than football.
ReplyDeletePersonally I can't see this deal happening, even if Aurier wins the appeal against his conviction it doesn't mean he will be allowed in the country. Even without a criminal conviction people are regularly denied entry in to the UK as subject to a banning order which the home office is allowed to issue.
Great article on a topic that is certainly dividing opinion.